Traffic Stops
Review why the vehicle was stopped, how long the detention lasted, whether consent was requested, whether a dog was used, and what facts police relied on to search.
Defense for Texas controlled-substance allegations involving possession, manufacture, delivery, intent to deliver, prescription medications, vehicle searches, homes, warrants, and alleged drug paraphernalia.
Drug cases often turn on two separate questions: whether the search was lawful and whether the State can actually connect the accused person to the substance with the knowledge and control required by law.
The controlled substance, its statutory penalty group, the aggregate weight alleged, and the type of conduct charged all matter. For example, possession of less than one gram of a Penalty Group 1 or 1-B substance is generally a state jail felony, while larger weights increase the offense level under Texas Health and Safety Code §481.115.
The defense should test the search, the alleged connection to the accused, the substance identification, weight, and the State's theory of possession or delivery.
Review why the vehicle was stopped, how long the detention lasted, whether consent was requested, whether a dog was used, and what facts police relied on to search.
Examine the affidavit, scope of the warrant, address, items authorized for seizure, execution, occupants, and whether the evidence exceeded the lawful search.
When drugs are not found directly on a person, the State may rely on surrounding facts to claim knowledge and control. Shared spaces can make that connection disputed.
The alleged substance and aggregate weight can determine the statutory range. Collection, packaging, chain of custody, testing, and laboratory documentation should be reviewed.
Quantity, packaging, communications, cash, scales, statements, surveillance, and other circumstances may be used to argue that a case involves delivery rather than personal possession.
A medication can still create criminal exposure when possession is alleged to be unauthorized. Prescription records and the exact substance classification can become central.
A drug case may depend on whether police had a lawful basis to stop, detain, enter, search, or seize. The analysis changes depending on whether officers relied on a warrant, consent, probable cause, a vehicle exception, a search incident to arrest, or another doctrine.
Write down the stop, entry, consent request, warrant, questioning, locations searched, who was present, and where police say the substance was found.
Document other occupants, passengers, owners, tenants, bedrooms, vehicles, containers, keys, and access that may matter to the possession theory.
Messages, location history, surveillance, receipts, prescriptions, and other records can matter depending on the State's theory.
Controlled-substance dispositions can create serious federal immigration consequences, making coordination especially important for noncitizens.
The charge label should not replace a fact-by-fact review of how the evidence was obtained and what it actually proves.
Collect reports, video, warrants, returns, dispatch information, witness accounts, and the timeline of the detention or entry.
Examine where the substance was found and what evidence allegedly links the accused person to knowing possession or control.
Review substance identification, weight, laboratory testing, packaging, chain of custody, and any evidence offered to prove intent to deliver.
Evaluate suppression, dismissal, reduction, diversion where available, negotiated resolution, or trial based on the developed record.
Federal immigration law can attach severe consequences to controlled-substance convictions and admissions. For a noncitizen, the exact statute, substance, record of conviction, plea language, and immigration history can matter. Criminal and immigration strategy should be coordinated before resolving the state case.
No. The offense level depends on the substance, penalty group, weight, and applicable statute. Some possession offenses can be misdemeanors, while others begin at the state-jail-felony level.
Texas controlled-substance statutes commonly grade offenses using aggregate weight, including adulterants or dilutants. That means the alleged statutory weight can be different from the weight of the pure controlled substance alone.
Potentially. Prosecutors can allege possession based on evidence of knowledge and control even when a substance is found elsewhere. The strength of that connection is often a major issue when several people have access to the location.
Potentially. Whether evidence is suppressible depends on the facts, the legal basis for the search or seizure, and how the evidence was obtained.
Yes. Controlled-substance cases can have particularly serious immigration consequences. A noncitizen should have the proposed disposition evaluated for immigration effects before entering a plea.
The broader defense framework for Texas criminal allegations.
Impaired-driving cases involving alcohol, prescription medication, controlled substances, or combinations.
Coordinating the criminal case with immigration consequences before a disposition is entered.
Tell us what substance is alleged, where it was found, whether a search warrant or traffic stop was involved, whether anyone made statements to police, and your next court date.
Drug cases often turn on possession, knowledge, search-and-seizure issues, lab evidence, statements, and the specific quantity alleged. Early review can help identify what evidence matters most.
Request a Consultation → Call 833-FOR-PIRIContacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.